Nolan v. Maximus Federal Services, Inc.
| Johnny Nolan |
| Maximus Federal Services, Inc. |
| 6:2023cv00010 |
| January 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Hanly A Ingram |
| Robert E Wier |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Maximus Federal Services, Inc..(Mayo, LaToi) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Robert E. Wier for review: re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Johnny Nolan (APR) |
Filing 11
ORDER: 1. Parties shall exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by MARCH 6, 2023. 2. Any motion to join additional parties or amended pleadings FILED by MARCH 30, 2023. 3. Fact discovery completed by FEBRUARY 15, 2024. 4. Per Rule 26(a)(2), NLT DECEMBER 1, 2023, Plaintiff shall disclose the identity of expert witnesses who may be used at trial, accompanied by written reports signed by the Rule 26(a)(2)(B) expert witnesses and/or written summaries consistent with Rule 26(a)(2)(C), as applicable, all in compliance with the rule. NLT JANUARY 1, 2024, Defendant shall provide same. 5. NLT MAY 15, 2025, parties shall file all dispositive motions. 6. In accordance with District Judge Wiers referral order (D.E. #6 ), the Court declines to schedule a pretrial conference, trial, or deadlines for related filings at this time. Upon resolution of any summary judgment motion or expiration of deadlines for same, Judge Wier will, as necessary and appropriate, set other deadlines and schedule further proceedings. Should the parties seek to establish in limine deadlines contemporaneous with the dispositive motion deadlines set forth above, they may file a motion to amend this Scheduling Order describing the need for such deadlines. 7. The Court builds the case schedule based on party input. Modification of this schedule thus is disfavored and will only occur under the standards and mechanics of Rule 16 and/or Rule 6, as applicable. 8. Other than the agreed-upon discovery limits within the parties Rule 26(f) report, the default limits within the discovery rules apply. 9. The Court HEREBY ORDERS that a telephonic status conference SHALL occur on FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. The call will be off the record and for counsel only. To join the teleconference, the parties are DIRECTED to call 1-606-371-5577 and enter Meeting ID 259497882. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 02/21/2023.(JCP)cc: COR, Lon CD
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram for review: #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (APR) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Mayo, LaToi) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Johnny Nolan filed by Maximus Federal Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex 2 - Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Ex 3 - Wage Report)(Mayo, LaToi) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING by Johnny Nolan re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Johnny Nolan (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Scharfenberger, Kurt) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY TO Kurt Scharfenberger re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Johnny Nolan; attorney failed to submit a proposed order as an electronic attachment to the motion. Entry by attorney; within 7 calendar days, prepare a document entitled "Notice of Filing", file the Notice using the event "Notice of Filing," attach the proposed order, and create a link to the related docket entry. cc: COR (APR) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Johnny Nolan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit stipulation, #2 Exhibit authority)(Scharfenberger, Kurt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2023: #3 Proposed Order) (APR). |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Maximus Federal Services, Inc..(Mayo, LaToi) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: (1) Within 21 days, the parties, by counsel, shall meet, either in person or by telephone, to consider the topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. (2) Within 14 days of the meeting, the parties shall file a joint status report containing: a-e. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 1/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge)(APR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs).. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/13/2019.(JCP)cc: COR
|
| Conflict Check run. (JCP) |
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (JCP) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Laurel County Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-875. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5454670), filed by Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1. State Court Record, #3 Exhibit 2. Complaint)(JCP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nolan v. Maximus Federal Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Johnny Nolan | |
| Represented By: | Kurt A. Scharfenberger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Maximus Federal Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | LaToi D. Mayo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
