Hamblin v. Wilson
Petitioner: Jonthan David Hamblin and Jonathan David Hamblin
Respondent: Jason Wilson
Case Number: 6:2023cv00018
Filed: February 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT: The Court ORDERS and ADJUDGES as follows: 1. Jonathan Hamblin's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [R. #1 ] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his right to pursue his claims in state court. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 02/09/2023.(KJA)cc: COR and Jonathan David Hamblin by US Mail
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Hamblin's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [R. #1 ] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his right to pursue his claims in state court. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. The Court will enter a corresponding Judgment. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 02/09/2023.(KJA)cc: COR and Jonathan David Hamblin by US Mail
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JCP)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jonthan David Hamblin, pro se.(No Filing Fee or IFP Motion) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit 1. State Court Commitment Order, #3 Exhibit 2. Inmate Grievance Form, #4 Envelope Post Mark Illegible)(JCP)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (JCP)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (JCP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamblin v. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonthan David Hamblin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonathan David Hamblin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?