Mowry v. SSA
| Justin Mowry |
| Commissioner of SSA |
| 6:2023cv00170 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Hanly A Ingram |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
JUDGMENT: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the administrative decision is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. This action is STRICKEN from the active docket of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 11/3/2023.(APR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER re #11 Motion to Remand to Agency: This Court hereby GRANTS the Commissioner's request for remand of this action for further proceedings, and REVERSES the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) with a REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 11/3/2023. (APR) cc: COR
|
| Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Remand to Agency by Commissioner of SSA (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Muir, Chad) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram for review: re #11 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Remand to Agency by Commissioner of SSA (APR) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of SSA.(Morgan, Cheryl) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Commissioner of SSA. (Muir, Chad) |
| Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram added. Judge Claria Horn Boom no longer assigned to case. See #7 NOTICE by Commissioner of SSA, John Mowry re #5 Order,, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE (APR) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Commissioner of SSA, John Mowry re #5 Order,, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Morgan, Cheryl). Modified text and added filer on 9/13/2023 (APR). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 9/12/2023. (MM)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Court advises the parties of the availability of US Mag. Judge to preside of case and enter Final Judgment. court further notes availability in all pending SS Actions, as well as new SS Actions assigned to undersigned. Parties shall confer concerning whether they voluntarily consent to jurisdiction of MJ for all further proceedings. If all parties consent via signing attached consent form, Clerk shall reassign matter to appropriate MJ on this docket without necessity of further Order of the Court. Parties free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 07/12/2018. (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form)(JCP)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER 22-15: STANDING PROCEDURES GOVERNING FILINGS, BRIEFING, AND RESOLUTION OF ACTIONS: 1. An action is commenced upon filing of the complaint. 2. Clerk to notify Commissioner of Social Security and the U.S. Attorney via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). 3. Answer to the complaint must be served within 60 days of notice of the action as outlined in (2) above. 4. FRCP 12 motions due within 60 days of notice of action as outlined in (2) above. 5. Action is presented for decision by parties briefs. (a) Plaintiffs Brief is due 30 days after the answer is filed OR within 30 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under paragraph (4) above. (b) Commissioners Brief due within 30 days after service of Plaintiffs Brief. (c) Plaintiff's Reply brief due within 14 days after service of Commissioners Brief. 6. Extensions of time, page limitations or permissions to file additional briefs may be granted for good cause shown. 7. Except as otherwise provided motion practice shall be governed by LR 7.1. 8. Clerk directed to file this General Order in all actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 9. On December 1, 2022, this General Order shall supersede General Order 13-17. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves. CC: COR.(JCP)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Justin Mowry (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(JCP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Process Necessary)., filed by Justin Mowry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JCP) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Boom for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Justin Mowry (JCP) |
| Conflict Check run. (JCP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mowry v. SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Justin Mowry | |
| Represented By: | James S. Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl D. Morgan, AUSA |
| Represented By: | Chad Muir, DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
