Webb v. Whitley County, Kentucky et al
| Whitley County, Kentucky, Brian Lawson, Sula Bowman, Kaytee George, Austin Caldwell, Zach Hughes, Joseph Cureton, Nick Huddleston, Southern Health Partners, Inc., Karen Baker, Tammi Hounshell, Rojetta Bowling and Jane and John Does |
| Tammy Webb |
| 6:2023cv00188 |
| October 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF FILING by Tammy Webb Waiver of Summons (Attachments: #1 Summons Waiver of Andrew Caldwell, #2 Summons Waiver of Brian Lawson, #3 Summons Waiver of Joseph Cureton, #4 Summons Waiver of Nick Huddleston, #5 Summons Waiver of Whitley County, Kentucky, #6 Summons Waiver of Zach Hughes)(Croley, Paul) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand by Austin Caldwell, Austin Caldwell, Joseph Cureton, Joseph Cureton, Nick Huddleston, Nick Huddleston, Zach Hughes, Zach Hughes, Brian Lawson, Brian Lawson, Whitley County, Kentucky.(Williams, Jason) |
Filing 9
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: Within 21 days of service of this order, parties shall conduct Rule 26 meeting to discuss nature and basis of claims and defense and possibilities of a prompt settlement or resolution of the case; make or arrange for disclosures; develop a proposed discovery plan. 2. NLT 14 days after meeting, counsel shall file a written joint report containing: See a-h. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/14/2023.(JCP)cc: COR
|
| Filing 8 INTERROGATORIES Propounded to Plaintiff by Southern Health Partners, Inc..(Shilts, Robert) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Southern Health Partners, Inc..(Shilts, Robert) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Admissions by Southern Health Partners, Inc..(Shilts, Robert) |
| Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Karen Baker, Karen Baker, Rojetta Bowling, Rojetta Bowling, Tammi Hounshell, Tammi Hounshell, Southern Health Partners, Inc.. (Shilts, Robert) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand by Karen Baker, Karen Baker, Rojetta Bowling, Rojetta Bowling, Tammi Hounshell, Tammi Hounshell, Southern Health Partners, Inc..(Shilts, Robert) |
| Conflict Check run. (JCP) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Karen Baker, Karen Baker, Rojetta Bowling, Rojetta Bowling, Sula Bowman, Sula Bowman, Austin Caldwell, Austin Caldwell, Joseph Cureton, Joseph Cureton, Jane and John Does(Sued as Unknown Individual Defendants 1-3), Jane and John Does(Sued as Unknown Entity Defendants 1-3), Kaytee George, Kaytee George, Tammi Hounshell, Tammi Hounshell, Nick Huddleston, Nick Huddleston, Zach Hughes, Zach Hughes, Brian Lawson, Brian Lawson, Southern Health Partners, Inc., Whitley County, Kentucky and returned to counsel electronically for service. (JCP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number BKYEDC-5680507), filed by Tammy Webb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit KRS 411.167, #3 Exhibit A. Order, #4 Summons Karen Baker, #5 Summons Austin Caldwell, #6 Summons Brian Lawson, #7 Summons Joseph Cureton, #8 Summons Nick Huddleston, #9 Summons Rojetta Bowling, #10 Summons SHP, #11 Summons Sula Bowman, #12 Summons Tammy Hounshell, #13 Summons Whitley County, #14 Summons Zach Huddleston, #15 Summons Kaytee George)(JCP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
