Patel et al v. Patel et al
| Shardaben Patel and Ashokkumar Patel |
| Bharatbhai Patel, Amit Patel and Kanu Patel |
| 6:2023cv00189 |
| October 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Hanly A Ingram |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs SHALL RESPOND to the request to stay proceedings (D.E. #7 ) on or before Friday, December 29, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 12/20/2023.(KJA)cc: COR
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Stay by Amit Patel, Bharatbhai Patel, Kanu Patel Motions referred to Hanly A. Ingram. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Stay and Motion for Extension)(Ridings, James) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Amit Patel, Bharatbhai Patel, Kanu Patel (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - State Docket as of 11/29/23, #4 Exhibit C - State Docket as of 12/18/23, #5 Exhibit D - Red-Line Comparison of Complaints, #6 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Ridings, James) |
| NOTICE OF FEE REFUND APPROVED the fee transaction involving Receipt No. AKYEDC-5679761 having been erroneously paid, the Clerk APPROVES the refund by processing a credit through the electronic credit card system. The credit refund transaction in the amount of $ 402.00 was successfully completed on 11/3/2023 at 10:14:05 cc: COR (KJA) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE regarding Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Ashokkumar Patel, Shardaben Patel (Bryant, Jeremy) cc: Finance. Modified text/event type pursuant to QC on 10/31/2023 (KJA). Modified text/event on 11/1/2023 (MM). |
|
Filing 4
STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 10/04/2021.(JCP)cc: COR
|
| Conflict Check run. (JCP) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and returned to counsel electronically for service. (JCP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5680603), filed by Shardaben Patel, Ashokkumar Patel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Bharatbhai Patel, #3 Summons Kanu Patel, #4 Summons Amit Patel)(JCP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
