Pryor v. Gilley et al
| James C. Pryor |
| J. Gilley, Ms. Landon, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Maddox and J. Green |
| 6:2023cv00195 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Correctional Officers J. Green, Maddox, U.S. Attorney, the U.S, Attorney General and delivered to U.S. Marshal with a completed USM-285 form and service packet for each defendant to be served. (KJA) |
Filing 7
ORDER: 1. Mr. Pryor may proceed with his claims against two of the named Defendants: USP-McCreary Correctional Officers "Mr. Maddox" and "Mr. J. Green"; 2. Mr. Pryor's other claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Thus, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to TERMINATE "J. Gilley," "Ms. Landon," and "Mr. Brooks," as Defendants in this action; 3. A Deputy Clerk of this Court is directed to prepare four Service Packets. 4. The Deputy Clerk is directed to deliver the Service Packets to the (USMS) in Lexington, Kentucky and note the date of delivery in the docket; 5. The USMS shall personally serve the two named Defendants Correctional Officers "Mr. Maddox" and "Mr. J. Green" at the USP McCreary in Pine Knot, Kentucky, and the USMS shall do so through arrangement with the FBOP; 6. The USMS shall also serve the USA by sending one Service packet by certified or registered mail to the Civil Process Clerk at the Office of the US Attorney for the EDKy and another ServicePacket by certified or registered mail to the Office of the Attorney General of the US in Washington, D.C.; 7. Within 60 days after being served, the two named Defendants must answer Mr. Pryor's Complaint. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 12/13/2023.(KJA)cc: COR and James C. Pryor by US Mail
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: 1. Pryor's motion for leave to proceed IFP #3 is GRANTED. Court WAIVES the $52.00 admin. fee. 2. Pyror must pay the $350.00 filing fee in the manner set forth below: see a-c. 3. Pryor must immediately advise the Clerk's Office, in writing, of any change in his address. If Pryor fails to do so, the Court may dismiss his case. 4. This matter now stands submitted for initial screening. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 11/14/2023.(JCP)cc: COR, FINANCE, JAMES C. PRYOR by US Mail, AND WARDEN AT BIG SANDY USP with Form EDKy 525 Form as Ordered
|
| Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JCP) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by James C. Pryor, pro se. (JCP) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James C. Pryor, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (JCP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO, filed by James C. Pryor, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Attachment Letter From USDC EDKY, #3 Envelope Post Mark Not Present)(JCP) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James C. Pryor (JCP) |
| Conflict Check run. (JCP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
