Wright v. USP McCreary
Marcus D. Wright |
Warden of USP McCreary |
6:2023cv00221 |
December 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Karen K Caldwell |
P SO |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER: 1. Wright's motion for reconsideration [R. #9 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 1/10/2024. (APR)cc: COR and Marcus D. Wright by US Mail |
Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration by Marcus D. Wright, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope Post Marked 01.04.2024)(JCP) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #9 MOTION for Reconsideration by Marcus D. Wright (JCP) |
Filing 8 Copy of Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed in 6CCA on 1/5/2024 and assigned case number 24-5016. (Attachments: #1 Case Opening Letter, #2 IFP Forms)(APR) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell and PSO for review: #8 Copy of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (APR) |
Filing 7 JUDGMENT: Marcus Wright's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 12/19/2023.(APR)cc: CORand Marcus D. Wright by US Mail |
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 1. Wright's petition for a writ of habeas corpus [R. #1 ] is DENIED without prejudice. 2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 3. This matter is STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 12/19/2023. (APR) cc: COR and Marcus D. Wright by US Mail |
Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JCP) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave by Marcus D. Wright, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Medical Record)(JCP) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marcus D. Wright, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (JCP) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Marcus D. Wright, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Envelope Post Marked 12/11/2023)(JCP) |
Conflict Check run. (JCP) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marcus D. Wright, #4 MOTION for Leave by Marcus D. Wright (JCP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wright v. USP McCreary | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Marcus D. Wright | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden of USP McCreary | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.