Ballou v. SSA
| Tammy Ray Ballou |
| Commissioner of SSA |
| 6:2024cv00032 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of SSA.(Morgan, Cheryl) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Ridgell-Boltz on behalf of Commissioner of SSA (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura) |
Filing 5
ORDER: granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 3/6/2024. (JMB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER 22-15: STANDING PROCEDURES GOVERNING FILINGS, BRIEFING, AND RESOLUTION OF ACTIONS: 1. An action is commenced upon filing of the complaint. 2. Clerk to notify Commissioner of Social Security and the U.S. Attorney via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). 3. Answer to the complaint must be served within 60 days of notice of the action as outlined in (2) above. 4. FRCP 12 motions due within 60 days of notice of action as outlined in (2) above. 5. Action is presented for decision by parties briefs. (a) Plaintiffs Brief is due 30 days after the answer is filed OR within 30 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under paragraph (4) above. (b) Commissioners Brief due within 30 days after service of Plaintiffs Brief. (c) Plaintiff's Reply brief due within 14 days after service of Commissioners Brief. 6. Extensions of time, page limitations or permissions to file additional briefs may be granted for good cause shown. 7. Except as otherwise provided motion practice shall be governed by LR 7.1. 8. Clerk directed to file this General Order in all actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 9. On December 1, 2022, this General Order shall supersede General Order 13-17. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves. CC: COR.(JCP)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tammy Ray Ballou (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(JCP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Process Necessary)., filed by Tammy Ray Ballou. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A. Notice of Appeals Council Action)(JCP) |
| Conflict Check run. (JCP) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tammy Ray Ballou (JCP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ballou v. SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tammy Ray Ballou | |
| Represented By: | Julie A. Atkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl D. Morgan, AUSA |
| Represented By: | Laura Ridgell-Boltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
