Pridemore v. SSA
Plaintiff: Ellis Pridemore
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 7:2008cv00065
Filed: March 31, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Letcher
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 15 JUDGMENT: The court, having affirmed the decision of the Commissioner, enters judgment in favor of the defendant Commissioner. There being no just cause for delay, this is a FINAL and APPEALABLE order. This matter is STRICKEN from the courts active docket.. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 10/24/08.(MCB)cc: COR w/NOE
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pridemore v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ellis Pridemore
Represented By: Patrick Heith Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?