Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Kentucky Eastern District Equitable Production Company v. A Tract of Property Situated in Martin County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 38-36, 13.91 Acres (Parcel 117) et al

Equitable Production Company v. A Tract of Property Situated in Martin County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 38-36, 13.91 Acres (Parcel 117) et al

Plaintiff:	Equitable Production Company
Defendant:	A Tract of Property Situated in Martin County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 38-36, 13.91 Acres (Parcel 117), A Tract of Property Situated in Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 15-2, 179.66 Acres (Parcel 135), A Tract of Property Situated In Pike County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 26-9, 94 Acres (Parcel 143), A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 49-144.05, 5.73 Acres (Parcel 233A), A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 77-38, 3 Acres (Parcel 179A), A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 77-38.03, 2.66 Acres (Parcel 179B), A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 78-30.01, 21.49 Acres (Parcel 204A) and A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 49-79, 17.29 Acres (Parcel 248)
Case Number:	7:2008cv00209
Filed:	November 6, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	Condemnation Office
County:	Martin
Presiding Judge:	Amul R. Thapar
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1332 Diversity-Torts to Land

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equitable Production Company v. A Tract of Property Situated in Martin County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 38-36, 13.91 Acres (Parcel 117) et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equitable Production Company
Represented By:	Michael J. Schmitt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: A Tract of Property Situated in Martin County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 38-36, 13.91 Acres (Parcel 117)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: A Tract of Property Situated in Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 15-2, 179.66 Acres (Parcel 135)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: A Tract of Property Situated In Pike County, Kentucky Corresponding to Property Tax Map Number 26-9, 94 Acres (Parcel 143)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 49-144.05, 5.73 Acres (Parcel 233A)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 77-38, 3 Acres (Parcel 179A)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 77-38.03, 2.66 Acres (Parcel 179B)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 78-30.01, 21.49 Acres (Parcel 204A)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: A Tract of Property Situated In Floyd County, Kentucky Corresponding To Property Tax Map Number 49-79, 17.29 Acres (Parcel 248)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?