Minix v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
Plaintiff: Kenny Minix
Defendant: Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
Case Number: 7:2009cv00090
Filed: July 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Pikeville Office
County: Magoffin
Presiding Judge: Amul R. Thapar
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's motion to reconsider order, R. 7 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 7/23/09.(MCB) cc: COR w/NOE
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minix v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenny Minix
Represented By: John C. Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
Represented By: Linsey W. West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?