Kazee v. Rosenberg et al
| D. B. Kazee |
| David E. Rosenberg, Rosenberg & Associates, LLC, Push Power Energy, LLC and Quest Corporation |
| 7:2010cv00055 |
| May 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Pikeville Office |
| Floyd |
| Amul R. Thapar |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: In this case, the evidence could plausibly support a jury verdict in favor of either party. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, R. 43 , 44 , are DENIED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 5/4/2011. (TDA)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Kazee shall have 14 days from date of this Order to file a motion to amend his complaint to substitute a real party in interest as a plaintiff. If he fails to do so, the court will enter an order grating the dfts' motion for judgment on the pleadings & dismissing this case; 2) because Kazee is not a real party in interest, his cross-motion for partial summary judgment 28 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If a real party in interest is substituted as a pla, that party may re-file the motion; 3) the dfts' motion for s/j 24 remains pending. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 2/22/2011.(RKT)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
