Wells v. Pepsi Bottling Group et al
| John Wells |
| Pepsi Bottling Group and Michael Charles |
| 7:2010cv00099 |
| August 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Pikeville Office |
| Pike |
| Amul R. Thapar |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. JUDGMENT is entered in f avor of Dft, Bottling Group, LLC, with respect to pla John Wells's claim for wrongful discharge. Wells's remaining negligence claim against dft and his claim against his coworker are REMANDED to the Pike Circuit Court. 2. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 6/8/2011. (TDA)cc: COR & Pike Circuit Court (certified copy w/ attested docket sheet)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: plaintiff Wells' motion to remand 11 is DENIED. Court previously denied Pepsi's motion to dismiss or compel arbitration without prejudice in order to first consider Wells' motion to remand. Pepsi may now re-file motion should it so choose. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 11/22/2010. (RKT) cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
