Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Nelson et al
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company |
Jimmy Nelson and Tawana Nelson |
7:2011cv00032 |
March 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Pikeville Office |
Johnson |
Amul R. Thapar |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) The Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, R. 84 , is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff on claims asserted in its complaint based on material false statement in insurance applicat ion. (2) This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's active docket. (3) Judgment in favor of Plaintiff shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/14/2012. (RCB)cc: COR |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Clark's motion to dismiss third-party complaint, R. 45 , is GRANTED. The claims asserted against Clark are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, it is ORDERED that Nationwide's motion for decl aratory judgment on the pleadings, R. 47 , is DENIED. At this time, a telephone conference is necessary to discuss discovery in this case. It is ORDERED that a telephone conference is SCHEDULED for Monday, January 9, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. The parties must DIAL IN to this conference call five minutes early by following these steps: See Items (1)-(3). Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/21/2011. (RCB)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.