Colley v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Theodore T. Colley, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 7:2011cv00094
Filed: June 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Pikeville Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Amul R. Thapar
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:7422
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: For these reasons, it is ORDERED that the plas motion to remand, R. 4 , is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the dfts motion to compel, R. 6 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 7/20/2011. (TDA)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colley v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theodore T. Colley, Jr.
Represented By: Adrian M. Mendiondo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?