Tomlinson v. Holder et al
Plaintiff: Randall D. Tomlinson
Defendant: D. Berkebile, Mark Tidwell, Jose A. Santos, Scott H. Middlebrooks and Eric Holder
Case Number: 7:2011cv00140
Filed: September 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Pikeville Office
County: Martin
Presiding Judge: PSO
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Pla Randall D. Tomlinson's Eighth Amendment condition-of-confinement claims against (a) Dft Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General, and (b) Dft Jose Santos, Chief Designator of BOP's DSCC, are DISMISSED WIT HOUT PREJUDICE for obvious failure to exhaust; (2) Tomlinson's Fifth Amendment claims challenging his disciplinary conviction and loss of 27 days of GTC will be dismissed without prejudice to Tomlinson fully exhausting those claims under 28 C.F.R. § 542.18 and successfully challenging his disciplinary conviction by way of a 28:2241 habeas corpus petition; (3) Pursuant to 28:1404(a), Tomlinson's Eighth Amendment condition-of-confinement and medical claims against (a) Dft Scott Middlebrook, Warden of USP (I)-Coleman, and (b) Dft Mark Tidwell, M.D., Medical Director of USP(I)-Coleman, are TRANSFERRED to the USDC for the Middle District of Florida for all further proceedings; (4) This action is DISMISSED from the docket of the Court; and (5) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order in favor of Dfts Eric Holder and Jose Santos. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 11/7/2011. (RCB)cc: COR, TOMLINSON
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tomlinson v. Holder et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Berkebile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Tidwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose A. Santos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott H. Middlebrooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randall D. Tomlinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?