Holder v. Saunders et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Holder
Defendant: Stacy M. Saunders, Terry J. King and John Doe
Case Number: 7:2013cv00038
Filed: May 2, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Pikeville Office
County: Martin
Presiding Judge: PSO
Presiding Judge: Amul R. Thapar
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 162 JUDGMENT: 1) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Dfts; 2) this judgment is FINAL and APPEALABLE; and 3) the matter is STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/7/2019. (TDA) cc: COR
November 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Saunders's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment, R. 89 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 11/4/15.(MJY)cc: COR
December 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Saunders motion for reconsideration, R. 40 , is GRANTED IN PART as to Holders race. (2) With Holders race no longer at issue, Saunders motion for reconsideration, R. 40 , is DENIED IN PART as to the motion for summary judgment. Saunders motion for summary judgment, R. 25 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/16/14.(MJY)cc: COR, Holder via US Mail
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) dfts motion to dismiss or in the alternative for S/J, R. 25 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows. a. Robert Farleys motion for S/J is GRANTED, and he is DISMISSED. b. Terry King s motion for S/J is GRANTED, and he is DISMISSED. c. Stacy Saunderss motion to dismiss or in the alternative for S/J is DENIED. (2) By Friday, August 22, 2014, dfts SHALL FILE a document stating David Berkebile s current mailing address, so that the Court can order the USMS to serve him with Holders complaint. If the dfts believe that David Berkebile was not the warden of Big Sandy on the date of the attack, then they should so inform the Court. (3) The Court will enter a separate order referring this matter to the Magistrate Judge for discovery. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 8/11/14. (MJY) cc: COR, Holder via US Mail
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holder v. Saunders et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stacy M. Saunders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry J. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?