Worldwide Equipment of TN, Inc. v. USA
||Worldwide Equipment of TN, Inc.
||July 11, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
||Amul R. Thapar
|Nature of Suit:
||Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 12, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The United States renewed motion to dismiss, R. 147 , is GRANTED. (2) Worldwides complaints in the four consolidated cases are DISMISSED. (3) This action is STRICKEN from the Courts active docket. (4) All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all scheduled hearings are CANCELLED. (5) A separate judgment will issue. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/12/16.(MJY) cc: COR (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/12/2016: # 1 Main Document) (MJY).
|June 23, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The governments motion to dismiss and for summary judgment, R. 75 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Worldwide may not proceed on its claim for a tax refund on trucks equipped to haul water, fuel, lube , or fly ash. The governments motion is otherwise denied. (2) Worldwides motion for summary judgment, R. 72 , is DENIED. (3) Worldwides motion to exclude the testimony of the governments experts, R. 73 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 6/23/16.(MJY)cc: COR
|June 15, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Worldwides motion in limine to exclude all post-sale use evidence, R. 71 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 6/15/2016.(MJY)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?