Preferred Care, Inc. et al v. Howell
Plaintiff: Preferred Care, Inc., Kentucky Partners Management, LLC, Preferred Care Partners Management Group, LP and Salyersville Health Facilities, LP
Defendant: Randy Howell
Case Number: 7:2016cv00013
Filed: February 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Pikeville Office
County: Magoffin
Presiding Judge: Edward B. Atkins
Presiding Judge: Amul R. Thapar
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Preferred Care's motion to compel arbitration, R. 14 , is GRANTED. (2) Preferred Care's motion to enjoin the defendant from pursuing his state-court action, R. 14 , is DENIED. (3) This matter is STAYED pending any further proceedings to enforce any award of the arbitrator. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 8/19/2016. (TDA) cc: COR
May 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Randy Howell's motion to dismiss, R. 7 , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED as to the wrongful-death claims asserted by Howell in the underlying state-court complaint, R. 1 -2. It is DENIED as to the remaining claims in the underlying state-court complaint. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 5/13/2016. (TDA) cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Preferred Care, Inc. et al v. Howell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Preferred Care, Inc.
Represented By: J. Peter Cassidy, III
Represented By: Anthony Bradley Gray
Represented By: Donald L. Miller, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kentucky Partners Management, LLC
Represented By: J. Peter Cassidy, III
Represented By: Anthony Bradley Gray
Represented By: Donald L. Miller, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Preferred Care Partners Management Group, LP
Represented By: J. Peter Cassidy, III
Represented By: Anthony Bradley Gray
Represented By: Donald L. Miller, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Salyersville Health Facilities, LP
Represented By: J. Peter Cassidy, III
Represented By: Anthony Bradley Gray
Represented By: Donald L. Miller, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randy Howell
Represented By: Miller Kent Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?