Pugh et al v. AIG Property Casualty Company et al
| Robert Pugh and P & P Construction, Inc. |
| AIG Property Casualty Company, Durrett Insurance Agency, LLP and Virginia Goff |
| 7:2017cv00143 |
| September 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Pikeville Office |
| Letcher |
| Karen K. Caldwell |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER: 1) the motion to reconsider 18 is DENIED; 2) the motion to dismiss 17 by dfts Virginia Goff and Durrett Insurance Agency, LLP is GRANTED and all claims against those dfts are DISMISSED; and 3) the motion to amend complaint 26 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 1/3/2019. (RCB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION & ORDER: 1) motion to remand (DE 4 ) is DENIED; 2) motion for leave to file sur-reply (DE 9 ) is GRANTED and Clerk SHALL FILE tendered sur-reply in record. The sur-reply is necessary because reply brief Pugh cites first time exhibits to sta te court complaint. The surreply explains what documents are and responds to arguments about documents made in reply brief. In resolving motion to remand, Court has also considered arguments regarding documents in Pugh's response to AIG's motion to file sur-reply; and 3) Pugh's motion for ruling (DE 13 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/29/2018.(TDA)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
