Casey v. Sanders et al
| Betty Casey |
| Unknown Rowe, Jonathan Rouse, William Alexander Payne, Richard W. Sanders and Darren Stapleton |
| 7:2017cv00145 |
| September 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Pikeville Office |
| Pike |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's motion for summary judgment (DE 40 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/13/2020. (RCB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER & OPINION: (1) Plafs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint DE 24 is GRANTED; (2) The Clerk SHALL FILE the tendered Amended Complaint in the record. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 7/26/19.(MJY)cc: COR Modified text on 7/26/2019 (MJY).
|
|
Filing
11
OPINION & ORDER: (1) Dfts Jonathan Rouse and Harold Curt Rowe's motion to dismiss (DE 5 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; (2) Dfts Richard W. Sanders, William Alexander Payne, and Darren Stapleton's motion to dismiss ( DE 6 ) is GRANTED; (3) all claims against Dfts Harold Curt Rowe, Richard W. Sanders, William Alexander Payne, and Darren Stapleton are DISMISSED; (4) Plas claims against Dft Jonathan Rouse for violation of John Casey's Fourteenth Amendment rights, violation of Americans with Disabilities Act, negligence, and gross negligence are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 6/21/2018. (TDA) cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
