Reid v. Kizziah

Petitioner: Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Respondent: G. Kizziah
Case Number: 7:2018cv00016
Filed: February 12, 2018
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Pikeville Office
County: Martin
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 29, 2018 6 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. Reid's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is GRANTED and payment of five dollar filing fee is WAIVED. 2. Reid's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28:2241 1 is DENIED. 3. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's docket. 4. Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 6/29/2018. (RCB)cc: COR, pro se party via U.S. mail

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reid v. Kizziah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: G. Kizziah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?