Meeks v. Kizziah
Petitioner: Douglas Marcel Meeks
Respondent: Gregory A. Kizziah
Case Number: 7:2018cv00080
Filed: July 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Pikeville Office
County: Martin
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2018 Filing 8 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to U.S. Attorney General re #6 Order (RCB)
September 17, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to U.S. Attorney's Office & Gregory Kizziah, Warden re #6 Order. (RCB)
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. Clerk send copy of Meek's petition #1 and this Order to Kizziah, USAG and USA. 2. Respondent file response to petition w/in 60 days. 3. Meeks file reply w/in 30 days after response. Then stand submitted for review. 4. Meeks keep Clerk informed of current mailing address. Failure may result in dismissal. 5. Meeks send copy of every document to respondent or its attorney. Each document include certificate confirming date mailed. Court will disregard document filed w/out certification. 6. Meeks must only communicate through notices or motion filed. Court will diregard correspondence sent to chambers. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 9/10/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipts) (TDA) cc: Meeks via US Mail; USM, Warden & USAG via Certified Mail w/ copy of DE #1
August 9, 2018 Filing 5 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Filing fee received - $ 5, receipt number 7005302 (RCB)
August 9, 2018 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #5 Filing Fee Received (RCB)
August 2, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Request for Withdrawal of Inmate's Personal Funds by Douglas Marcel Meeks pro se (Attachments: #1 Envelope USPS Returned to Meeks, #2 Envelope pm 7/31/18)(RCB)
July 27, 2018 Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(RCB)
July 27, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Douglas Marcel Meeks pro se. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Letter re Filing Fee, #4 Envelope pm 7/25/18)(RCB)
July 27, 2018 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner advised a check for the filing fee had been sent. (RCB)
July 27, 2018 Conflict Check run. (RCB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meeks v. Kizziah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Douglas Marcel Meeks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gregory A. Kizziah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?