Thornsbury v. Walmart Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Lydia Thornsbury
Defendant: John Doe(s), Roger Collier and Walmart Inc.
Case Number: 7:2018cv00089
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1. Within 21 days, parties shall meet to consider the topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. 2. Within 14 days of meeting, parties shall file a joint status report. Parties, if they choose to consent to Magistrate Judge, should indicate by signing attached consent form NLT date the joint status report is due. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 10/1/2018. (Attachments: #1 AO 85 form)(RCB)cc: COR
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: 1. Court DISMISSES claims against Dft Roger Collier, without prejudice. 2. Court DENIES as moot Dft Roger Collier's motion to dismiss (DE #1 -3 at 41-45). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 9/26/2018. (RCB)cc: COR
September 21, 2018 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Wier for review: #1 Notice of Removal (RCB)
August 21, 2018 Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walmart Inc. (RCB)
August 21, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pike Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-266, filed by Walmart Inc., Roger Collier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Roger Collier, #2 Exhibit 2 - RFA Responses, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court Record, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(RCB)
August 21, 2018 Conflict Check run. (RCB)
August 21, 2018 ANSWER (State Court) to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Roger Collier, Walmart Inc. (RCB) See DE #1 , attachment #3, for pdf document.
August 21, 2018 MOTION to Dismiss (State Court) by Roger Collier (RCB) See DE #1 , attachment #3, for pdf document.
August 21, 2018 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Wier for review: re MOTION to Dismiss (State Court) by Roger Collier (RCB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornsbury v. Walmart Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe(s)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Collier
Represented By: Thomas Edward Stevens
Represented By: Jennifer Kincaid Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Edward Stevens
Represented By: Jennifer Kincaid Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lydia Thornsbury
Represented By: Ashley Tackett Laferty
Represented By: David Matthew Runyon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?