Keyes v. Wilson et al
Ellis Keyes |
Matt Wilson and City of Fort Payne, Alabama |
7:2019cv00041 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
P SO |
Robert E Wier |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury demand against City of Fort Payne, Alabama, Matt Wilson, filed by Ellis Keyes. (Note: filed per DE #8 .)(MJY) |
Filing 8 ORDER: 1. Court GRANTS DE #7 IN PART but otherwise wholly DENIES the motion. 2. Court DIRECTS the Clerk to re-docket DE 7-1 as the operative "Amended Complaint." 3. This matter remains STAYED and Keyes's DE #6 -Ordered reporting obligation persists. To be clear, this means that if Keyes fails to update the Court on the status of the Alabama prosecution on or before August 18, 2019, the Court will likely dismiss this matter (without prejudice) for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 6/24/19.(MJY) cc: COR, Keyes via US Mail. |
Filing 7 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Ellis Keyes, Pro Se. Motions referred to PSO. (Attachments: #1 Tendered Amended Complaing)(MJY) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #7 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Ellis Keyes, Pro Se. (MJY) |
Filing 6 ORDER: 1. Court GRANTS DE #3 ; 2. Court STAYS matter pending resolution of Keyes's Alabama criminal proceedings; and 3. Keyes SHALL file a status report regarding the status of his criminal case w/in 90 days of this Order. Court bases this ddl on Plafs representations regarding the Alabama schedule. If state court schedule changes, Keyes may request an extension. However, if Keyes fails to submit the ordered report or request an extension on or before the 90-day deadline, the Court will likely dismiss this matter (without prejudice) for failure to prosecute. Keyes initiated suit & it is his responsibility to litigate it. Here, that duty includes a specific obligation to keep the Court apprised of the related criminal case's status. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 5/20/19.(MJY)cc: COR, Keyes via US Mail. |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 5/6/16.(MJY)cc: COR, Keyes via hand delivery. |
Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers. (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)cc: pro se filer via hand delivery.(MJY) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ellis Keyes, Pro Se. Motions referred to P SO. (MJY) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED)., filed by Ellis Keyes, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 MCHC Office Visit dated 5-14-19)(MJY) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ellis Keyes, pro se. (MJY) |
Conflict Check run. (MJY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.