Johnston v. Warden, USP Big Sandy
Andrew Johnston |
Warden, USP Big Sandy |
7:2019cv00083 |
October 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Joseph M Hood |
P SO |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appreciation by Andrew Johnston pro se (Attachments: #1 Envelope pm 11/14/19)(RCB) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Andrew Johnston re Clerk's Virtual Notice-PSO entered 10/16/19. (TDA) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT: 1. Johnston's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28:2241 (R. #1 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to Johnston's right to file a civil rights complaint asserting his claims; 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's active docket; and 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 10/17/2019. (TDA) cc: Johnston via US Mail |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Johnston's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28:2241 (R. #1 ) is DENIED without prejudice to Johnston's right to reassert conditions of confinement claims in civil rights complaint. 2. Clerk SHALL SEND Johnston a civil rights complaint form (EDKY Form 520), an Affidavit of Assets/In Forma Pauperis Application (AO-240 Form), and a Certificate of Inmate Account Form (EDKY Form 523). 3. Johnston may file a civil rights complaint regarding his conditions of confinement claims (EDKY Form 520). However he must use Court approved forms. a. AO-240, b. EDKY Form 523. 4. matter is CLOSED and STRICKEN from Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 10/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 EDKY Form 520, #2 AO 240 Form, #3 EDKY Form 523) (TDA) cc: Johnston w/ forms via US Mail |
Filing 3 LETTER from Andrew Johnston regarding Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Filing Fee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Postmarked 10/11/19) (TDA) |
CLERK'S VIRTUAL NOTICE TO Andrew Johnston re #3 Letter: In response to a request for non-receipt of mail, a courtesy copy of the docket sheet in the above-styled case is enclosed. The docket sheet provides a timeline of the activity in your case with a list of filings in the case to date. cc: Andrew Johnston by US Mail. (TDA) |
Conflict Check run. (TDA) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - no fees paid nor motion ifp filed. (TDA) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (No Filing fee paid), filed by Andrew Johnston pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Postmarked 9/30/19) (TDA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnston v. Warden, USP Big Sandy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden, USP Big Sandy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Andrew Johnston | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.