Stapleton v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
Cora Stapleton |
Tiffany Coleman, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc., Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky, Inc., Tiffany Hamilton, Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius Management Services, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and Fresenius USA Sales, Inc. |
7:2019cv00118 |
December 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
David L Bunning |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Cora Stapleton filed by Cora Stapleton. (Liska, Michael) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David Bunning for review: re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Cora Stapleton. (MJY) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Cora Stapleton filed by Fresenius Management Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Johnson v. Boyd, #2 Proposed Order)(Murphy, Kevin) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Cora Stapleton (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Redacted Fresenius Medical Records, #3 Exhibit Fresenius Clinical Manager Job Description, #4 Exhibit OIG Report, #5 Proposed Order)(Liska, Michael) |
Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky, Inc., Fresenius Management Services, Inc., Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc., Fresenius USA Sales, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc. (RCB) |
Filing 4 NOTICE AND CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL by Fresenius Management Services, Inc. (RCB) |
Filing 3 CONSENT TO REMOVAL by Defendants Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky, Inc., Tiffany Coleman, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc., Fresenius USA Sales, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc., re #1 Notice of Removal. (RCB) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pike Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-1097, filed by Fresenius Management Services, Inc. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4544922) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Filing Removal, #3 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #5 Exhibit B - Service on FMS, Inc., #6 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Tiffany Coleman Hamilton, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(RCB) |
ANSWER to Complaint by Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. (NOTE: State Court Pleading, see DE #1 for pdf document) (RCB) |
ANSWER to Complaint by Fresenius Management Services, Inc. (NOTE: State Court Pleading, see DE #1 for pdf document) (RCB) |
ANSWER to Complaint by Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky, Inc. (NOTE: State Court Pleading, see DE #1 for pdf document) (RCB) |
ANSWER to Complaint by Fresenius USA, Inc. (NOTE: State Court Pleading, see DE #1 for pdf document) (RCB) |
Conflict Check run. (RCB) |
ANSWER to Complaint by Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. (NOTE: State Court Pleading, see DE #1 for pdf document) (RCB) |
ANSWER to Complaint by Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. (NOTE: State Court Pleading, see DE #1 for pdf document) (RCB) |
ANSWER to Complaint by Tiffany Coleman. (NOTE: State Court Pleading, see DE #1 for pdf document) (RCB) |
ANSWER to Complaint by Fresenius USA Sales, Inc. (NOTE: State Court Pleading, see DE #1 for pdf document) (RCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.