Parsons v. Chafin
Plaintiff: James R. Parsons
Defendant: Judith Chafin
Case Number: 7:2020cv00024
Filed: February 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Edward B Atkins
Referring Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2020 Filing 19 NOTICE to Take Deposition of JUDITH CHAFIN on MAY 7, 2020 AT 2:00 p.m. by James R. Parsons.(Schaeffer, Brittney)
April 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 AGREED QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER: re #17 Governing protected health information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 4/6/2020.(RCB)cc: COR
April 3, 2020 Filing 17 Proposed Agreed Qualified Protective Order by Judith Chafin, James R. Parsons. (Smith, Lee) Modified text on 4/3/2020 (RCB).
April 3, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE by Judith Chafin of Service of Discovery (Smith, Lee)
April 3, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE to Take Deposition of James R. Parsons on May 7, 2020 1:00 p.m. by Judith Chafin.(Smith, Lee)
April 3, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: re #17 Proposed Agreed Qualified Protective Order by Judith Chafin, James R. Parsons (RCB)
March 26, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE OF FILING by James R. Parsons Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Requests for Production of Documents (Schaeffer, Brittney)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: the telephonic mid-discovery conference (currently scheduledfor June 24, 2020) is ADVANCED to June 23, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. The call shall be on the record, and will originate from Pikeville. Counsel shall access conference by calling AT&T Teleconferencing at 1-877-336-1839; entering the access code 4162817; and when requested, entering security code 0057. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 3/25/2020. (RCB)cc: COR
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. parties file any motion to join parties or amend pleadings by October 14, 2020. 2. NLT September 16, 2020, parties complete all fact and expert discovery. Supp under Rule 26(e) must also be completed on or before this date. 3. Per FRCP 26(a)(2), NLT June 1, 2020, plf disclose identity of expert witnesses, accompanied by written reports. Dft NLT July 1, 2020. These disclosures need not be filed in Court record. Supp NLT January 4, 2021. 4. parties have to October 25, 2020, to file all dispositive and Daubert motions. A courtesy copy of briefs and memoranda in support of motions must be provided to Judge Wier's Chambers by email not less than 48 hours prior to electronic filing; 5. telephonic mid-discovery conference on June 24, 2020, at 10:30 a.m., on the record, from Pikeville. Counsel shall access conference by calling AT&T Teleconferencing at 1-877-336-1839; entering access code 4162817; and entering security code 0057. 6. Should parties desire to participate in a settlement conference before undersigned, parties are directed to contact Chambers directly, via email. 7. In event discovery dispute arises, parties are directed to comply with Court's protocol. R. #3 , 5. Requests to modify any dates or deadlines shall be submitted upon motion filed prior to expiration of deadline in question and showing good cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 3/25/2020. (RCB)cc: COR
March 24, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: #11 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (RCB)
March 23, 2020 Filing 11 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Smith, Lee)
March 11, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF FILING by James R. Parsons Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures (Schaeffer, Brittney)
March 10, 2020 Filing 9 DISCLOSURES Rule 26 Initial Disclosures by Judith Chafin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Transcript of Recorded Statement, #2 Exhibit Policy and Declarations Pages)(Smith, Lee)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: 1. The show-cause order #6 is DISCHARGED. 2. a. parties, within 21 days shall meet, to consider topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. b. parties, within 14 days of meeting, shall file a joint status report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 2/26/2020. (RCB)cc: COR
February 25, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: #7 Amended Document re #1 Notice of Removal (RCB)
February 24, 2020 Filing 7 AMENDED DOCUMENT re #1 Notice of Removal by Judith Chafin. Amended Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Deed, #2 Exhibit Voter Registration, #3 Exhibit Marriage License, #4 Exhibit Police Report)(Smith, Lee) Modified link, text on 2/25/2020 (RCB).
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: defendant, by February 26, 2020, is directed to clarify by proper amendment, 28 U.S.C. 1653, whether diversity of citizenship in fact exists between parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 2/19/2020. (RCB)cc: COR
February 19, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING by Judith Chafin (Smith, Lee)
February 19, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: #4 Answer to Complaint (RCB)
February 18, 2020 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Judith Chafin.(Smith, Lee)
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier. (RCB)cc: COR
February 18, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pike Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-137, filed by Judith Chafin. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4597728) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 State Court Service of Process)(RCB)
February 18, 2020 Conflict Check run. (RCB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parsons v. Chafin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judith Chafin
Represented By: Lee A. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James R. Parsons
Represented By: William R. Johnson
Represented By: Brittney N. Schaeffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?