Holland v. Safe Auto Insurance Company
| James Holland |
| Safe Auto Insurance Company |
| 7:2020cv00053 |
| April 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| David L Bunning |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: (A) DEADLINES AND CASE SCHEDULE (1) Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures by June 29, 2020. (2) Motion to Join Parties/Amend Pleadings by November 2, 2020. (3) Rule 26(a)(2) Expert Witness Disclosures Pla by January 4, 2021; Dft March 1, 2021. (4) All Discovery by April 5, 2021. (5) Status Report by April 5, 2021. (6) Dispositive or Daubert Motions by May 3, 2021. (7) Copies of Memoranda Copy of briefs & memo be provided to Chambers w/in 48 hours; courtesy copy be emailed to chambers. (B) REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE & PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY PROCEDURE (1) case referred to Mag Judge Edward B. Atkins to supervise discovery & pretrial & status conferences, hold hearings, and rule non-dispositive motions, except motions in limine. (2) Discovery disputes be resolved in following manner: see items a-c. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 5/22/2020. (TDA) cc: COR
|
| Filing 6 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Safe Auto Insurance Company. (Kemper, William) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Bunning for review: #6 Joint Status Report (TDA) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1) w/in 21 days, parties meet to discuss Rule 26(a)(1). 2) w/in 10 days of meeting, parties shall file joint status report containing: (see items a-e). (3) Should parties find joint report not possible, parties shall file individual reports, for purposes of Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 5/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 MJ Consent Form) (TDA) cc: COR
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Safe Auto Insurance Company.(Burd, James) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Bunning for review: #4 Answer to Complaint (TDA) |
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Safe Auto Insurance Company. (TDA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Letcher Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-77. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4653116), filed by Safe Auto Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 SC Notice of Filing Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (TDA) |
| Conflict Check run. (TDA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holland v. Safe Auto Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Holland | |
| Represented By: | William V. Meader |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Safe Auto Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | William Douglas Kemper |
| Represented By: | James M. Burd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
