Presley v. SSA
| Michael Lee Presley |
| Commissioner of SSA |
| 7:2020cv00134 |
| October 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Henry R Wilhoit |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Commissioner of SSA. (Morgan, Cheryl) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Lee Presley via Certified Mail by USM to Commissioner of SSA served on 11/6/2020. Service to U.S. Attorney executed via Certified Mail by USM on 11/3/2020; Service to U.S. Attorney General executed via Certified Mail by USM on 11/9/2020. (RCB) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of SSA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons issued and delivered to U.S. Marshal for service. (RCB) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/30/2020: #1 Receipt) (RCB). |
Filing 5
ORDER: re #3 1. plf's motion is SUSTAINED. 2. plf may proceed herein without payment of costs or fees. 3. Clerk is directed to file Complaint previously tendered by Plf. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr., on 10/30/2020. (RCB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER 20-17 re: Filing of Answers and Administrative Transcripts in Social Security Benefit Cases: 1. For cases challenging Final decisions of Commission of Social Security involving denial of benefits, the time for filing an Answer and administrative transcript is extended to 120 days following service of process. 2. This Order applies to pending cases in which Answers have not been filed and future cases through April 1, 2021. 3. Extensions given by this Order expire 4/1/2021. Expiration of Order does not prohibit Commissioner from seeking additional extensions in individual cases. Signed by Chief Judge Danny C. Reeves on September 25, 2020. cc: COR, USA (RCB)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Lee Presley (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(RCB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Lee Presley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Appeals Council Denial, #2 Exhibit B - ALJ Unfavorable Decision, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons SSA, #5 Proposed Summons USA, #6 Proposed Summons AG, #7 USM-285 form)(RCB) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Wilhoit for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Lee Presley (RCB) |
| Conflict Check run. (RCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Presley v. SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl D. Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Lee Presley | |
| Represented By: | William Grover Arnett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
