McLendon v. USP Big Sandy
| Jahleel McLendon |
| USP Big Sandy |
| 7:2020cv00148 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| P SO |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: (1) To extent McLendon is currently seeking relief from this Court, that request (Doc. #5 ) is DENIED without prejudice; (2) If McLendon wishes to pursue a new civil rights case, he may do so by completing and filing a new action in accordance with instructions set forth in both this Order and Court's prior Order, (Doc. #4 ). Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/20/2021. (TDA) cc: McLendon via US Mail
|
| Filing 5 LETTER re Remedial Form (BP'8), filed by Jahleel McLendon pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - USP Thomson Inmate Bulletin, #2 Envelope PM 1/13/2021) (TDA) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #5 Letter re Remedial Form (BP'8) by Jahleel McLendon. (TDA) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: 1. McLendon's submission at Doc. #1 is DISMISSED w/out prejudice. 2. This specific action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. The Clerk's Office shall promptly send McLendon the following blank forms: a. a Court-approved Civil Rights Complaint Form [EDKY 520 Form]; b. an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [AO 240 Form]; and c. a Certificate of Inmate Account Form [EDKy 523 Form]. 4. If McLendon wishes to start a new civil rights case, he may do so by completing and filing a new action in accordance with the instructions set forth above. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 12/1/2020.(MJY)cc: COR and McLendon w/forms as noted by US Mail Modified text on 12/1/2020 (MJY).
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample caption page)(MJY) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint by Jahleel McLendon, Pro Se. (MJY) |
| Conflict Check run. (MJY) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO, filed by Jahleel McLendon, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Postmarked 11-18-20) Note: No Fees Paid.(MJY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McLendon v. USP Big Sandy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USP Big Sandy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jahleel McLendon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
