Adkins v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
| Melva Adkins |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 7:2021cv00006 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| Robert E Wier |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: 1. By April 5, 2021, parties shall meet to consider topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. 2. Within 14 days of meeting, parties shall file a joint status report containing: a-d. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 3/16/2021.(RCB)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: #8 Answer to Complaint (RCB) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: re #10 Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Motion for Entry of Default Judgment #7 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 3/15/2021. (RCB)cc: COR
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw by Melva Adkins Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hicks, Henry) |
| Filing 9 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. for Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.. (O'Brien, Edward) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.(O'Brien, Edward) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Wier for review: re #7 MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment by Melva Adkins (RCB) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION TO Henry Hicks re #7 MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment by Melva Adkins; Error: attachments were insufficiently described as "Exhibit 1," "Exhibit 2." Entry by attorney; Correction: the Clerk renamed the attachments. Attachments must be adequately described. Example: Exhibit 1 (incorrect); Exhibit 1 Affidavit of John Doe (correct). No further action required by counsel. cc: COR (RCB) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment by Melva Adkins Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons Returned Executed, #3 Proposed Order)(Hicks, Henry) Modified text on 3/15/2021 (RCB). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Melva Adkins via Certified Mail to Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Hicks, Henry) Modified text on 2/26/2021 (RCB). |
| NOTICE OF ACTION BY CLERK STRIKING A DOCUMENT FROM THE RECORD re #5 Summons Returned Executed was an INCOMPLETE PDF document filed as main document; Attorney shall re-file the corrected Summons Returned Executed to include both pages of issued summons with completed proof of service page (along green card if served by certified mail) within seven (7) calendar days. *TDA* cc: COR (RCB) |
| Filing 5 STRICKEN FROM DOCKET: INCOMPLETE DOCUMENT PURSUANT to Notice of Action Striking Document filed on 2/26/2021. |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically. (RCB) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier. (RCB)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Melva Adkins. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-4885157) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(RCB) |
| Conflict Check run. (RCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adkins v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Melva Adkins | |
| Represented By: | Henry David Hicks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Edward M. O'Brien |
| Represented By: | James M. Burd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
