Griffith v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership et al
| James Griffith |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership and Timothy Borowski |
| 7:2021cv00081 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| Robert E Wier |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: 1. Within 21 days, parties meet to consider topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. 2. Within 14 days of meeting, parties file joint status report containing: see items a-d. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 11/24/2021. (TDA) cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: #9 Answer to Complaint. (TDA) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Timothy Borowski, Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership.(Lamb, Emily) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: parties' motion (R. #7 is GRANTED. Dfts shall have until November 22, 2021 to file a responsive pleading to Complaint filed October 5, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 10/28/2021. (TDA) cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: re #7 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension to File Responsive Pleading by Timothy Borowski, Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership. (TDA) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension by Timothy Borowski, Timothy Borowski, Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership. (Lamb, Emily) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David Domene on behalf of Timothy Borowski, Timothy Borowski, Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership (Domene, David) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier. (RCB)cc: COR
|
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership. (RCB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily C. Lamb on behalf of Timothy Borowski, Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership (RCB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pike Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-832, filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Timothy Borowski. (Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5107503) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(RCB) |
| Conflict Check run. (RCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
