Slone et al v. Quest Energy Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Ray Slone and Barbara Slone
Defendant: Quest Energy Corporation, Samuel Coal Company, Inc., Thomas M. Sauve and Mark C. Jensen
Case Number: 7:2021cv00101
Filed: December 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Edward B Atkins
Referring Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Wier for review: re #8 MOTION to Remand by Barbara Slone, Ray Slone. (TDA)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand by Barbara Slone, Ray Slone filed by Barbara Slone. (Morgan, Daniel)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE re #7 Order Plas failed to file a proposed scheduling and discovery plan as required by Court's Order of December 8, 2021 by Mark C. Jensen, Quest Energy Corporation, Samuel Coal Company, Inc., Thomas M. Sauve. (Gartland, Michael) Modified text on 1/13/2022 (TDA).
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Gartland, Michael)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand by Barbara Slone, Ray Slone filed by Mark C. Jensen, Quest Energy Corporation, Samuel Coal Company, Inc., Thomas M. Sauve. (Gartland, Michael)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: #13 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (TDA)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion #10 is GRANTED. Parties shall have 14 days following Court's ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand #8 to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 1/11/2022. (RCB) cc: COR
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to conduct the Rule 26(f) conference by Barbara Slone, Ray Slone. Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Morgan, Daniel) Modified text on 1/7/2022 (TDA).
December 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING by Barbara Slone, Ray Slone re #8 MOTION to Remand by Barbara Slone, Ray Slone (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Morgan, Daniel)
December 27, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY TO Daniel Luke Morgan re #8 MOTION to Remand by Barbara Slone, Ray Slone; Error: attorney failed to submit a [proposed order] as an electronic attachment to the motion. Entry by attorney; within 7 calendar days, prepare a document entitled "Notice of Filing", file the Notice using the event "Notice of Filing," attach the proposed order, and create a link to the related docket entry. cc: COR (RCB)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Barbara Slone, Ray Slone (Attachments: #1 Sam Coal Corporate Information)(Morgan, Daniel) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/27/2021: #2 Proposed Order) (RCB).
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: by WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2022, each party shall prepare and submit to undersigned a proposed scheduling and discovery plan. The proposed scheduling and discovery plan shall discuss following matters: See (a)-(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 12/8/2021. (RCB)cc: COR
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Samuel Coal Company, Inc.. (Gartland, Michael)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Quest Energy Corporation. (Gartland, Michael)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Mark C. Jensen, Quest Energy Corporation, Samuel Coal Company, Inc., Thomas M. Sauve.(Gartland, Michael)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier. (TDA) cc: COR
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Knott Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-217. (Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5139158), filed by Mark C. Jensen, Thomas M. Sauve, Quest Energy Corporation, Samuel Coal Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (TDA)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (TDA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slone et al v. Quest Energy Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ray Slone
Represented By: Daniel Luke Morgan
Represented By: Drake W. Staples
Represented By: Ned Pillersdorf
Represented By: Robert E. Maclin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Slone
Represented By: Daniel Luke Morgan
Represented By: Drake W. Staples
Represented By: Ned Pillersdorf
Represented By: Robert E. Maclin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quest Energy Corporation
Represented By: Michael Joseph Gartland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel Coal Company, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Joseph Gartland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas M. Sauve
Represented By: Michael Joseph Gartland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark C. Jensen
Represented By: Michael Joseph Gartland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?