Reynolds v. General Motors LLC
Plaintiff: Tina Reynolds
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Case Number: 7:2021cv00102
Filed: December 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Edward B Atkins
Referring Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: 1. By February 15, 2022, parties shall meet to consider topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. 2. Within 14 days of meeting, parties shall file a joint status report containing: a-b. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 1/14/2022. (RCB)cc: COR
January 13, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: #1 Notice of Removal (RCB)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier. (RCB)cc: COR
December 14, 2021 Conflict Check run. (RCB)
December 13, 2021 Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by General Motors LLC (RCB)
December 13, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pike Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-968, filed by General Motors LLC. (Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5145546) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Service of Process, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Notice of Removal)(RCB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reynolds v. General Motors LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Reynolds
Represented By: Dustin Robert Williams
Represented By: E. Todd Tracy
Represented By: Gary C. Johnson
Represented By: Trent Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Represented By: Amanda McFarland Lockaby
Represented By: Linsey W. West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?