Conn v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff: Delano Conn
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Case Number: 7:2022cv00010
Filed: February 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Edward B Atkins
Referring Judge: David L Bunning
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Bunning for review: re #9 MOTION to Remand by Delano Conn (RCB)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand by Delano Conn WM Response in Opposition to Pf's Motion to Remand filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Pf's Response to RFA)(Adams, Jennifer)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION to Remand by Delano Conn filed by Delano Conn. (Hammond, Glenn)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Remand by Delano Conn (Attachments: #1 Duplicate Motion, #2 Proposed Order)(Hammond, Glenn) Modified text on 3/11/2022 (RCB). Memorandum in Support filed at DE #10 .
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: parties have filed an Agreed Protective Order to preserve confidentiality of confidential, non-public, and/or sensitive documents and information, without infringing on prosecution of parties' claims. Court ACCEPTS and GRANTS terms or conditions parties have outlined in Order #6 . Therefore, it shall be incorporated by reference herein and shall be entered as an attachment to this order with the following modifications: See 1-3. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 3/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Agreed Protective Order)(RCB)cc: COR
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: (A) (1) Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures March 31, 2022. (2) Motions to Join Parties or Amend Pleadings August 31, 2022. (3) Close of Fact Discovery October 31, 2022. (4) Rule 26(a)(2) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports, Plf November 30, 2022, Dft February 15, 2023. (5) Dispositive Motions December 30, 2022. (6) Close of Expert Discovery April 14, 2023. (7) Status Report April 14, 2023 (close of discovery). (8) Final Witness and Exhibit Lists May 14, 2023. (9) Copies of Memoranda A courtesy copy of briefs and memoranda in support of motions provided to Chambers within 48 hours of electronic filing; said courtesy copy should e-mailed to Judge Bunning's Chambers. (1) This case is referred to Mag. Judge Edward B. Atkins to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings. (2) Discovery disputes resolved in following manner: see a-c. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/9/2022. (RCB)cc: COR
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: re #6 Proposed Agreed Order Agreed Protective Order by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (RCB)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order Agreed Protective Order by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Adams, Jennifer)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Adams, Jennifer)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Bunning for review: #5 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (RCB)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Bunning for review: re #6 Proposed Agreed Order Agreed Protective Order by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (RCB)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: (1) Within 21 days from date of entry of this Order, parties shall meet as required by Rule 26(a)(1). (2) Within 10 days after meeting, parties shall file a joint status report containing: a-d; (e) whether parties will consent to jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge (Atkins) for all further proceedings. Consent forms attached. (3) Should parties find a joint report is not possible, parties shall each file individual reports. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 2/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 MJ Consent Form) (RCB) cc: COR
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (TDA)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pike Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-664. (Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5190349), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - WM 1st Set of Rogs and RFPD to PL, #2 Exhibit 2 - PL's Resp to Def RFP, #3 Exhibit 3 - SCR & Previous USDC Filings, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (TDA)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ANSWER to Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. State Court pleading, see DE #1 Ex 3 pgs 24-31 for pdf (TDA)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (TDA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conn v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delano Conn
Represented By: Glenn Martin Hammond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Represented By: Jennifer Kincaid Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?