Moore v. Hughes
Jason J. Moore |
Craig Hughes |
7:2022cv00089 |
August 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
William O Bertelsman |
P SO |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER: 1. This civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and this specific action is STRICKEN from Court's docket. 2. That said, Clerk's Office is directed to send Moore a blank Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 2241 [E.D. Ky. 521 Form]. 3. This specific civil action will remain closed. However, if Moore wants to file a new habeas action regarding the matter he raised, he may do so by completing and filing that new action in accordance with instructions set forth above. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 10/21/2022. (RCB)cc: COR and Jason J. Moore w/forms by US Mail |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #6 Order. No fees paid. (RCB) |
Filing 6 ORDER: 1. Moore's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is DENIED. 2. Within 30 days from the entry of this Order, Moore MUST pay the $5.00 filing fee in this case to Clerk. If Moore fails to pay that fee within time allotted, Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 9/12/2022. (RCB) cc: COR and Jason J. Moore by US Mail Modified text on 10/13/2022 (RCB). |
Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(RCB) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jason J. Moore, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope no pm)(RCB) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason J. Moore, pro se. Motions referred to PSO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Envelope no pm)(RCB) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jason J. Moore, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Record Card, #2 Exhibit 2 - Knott County case 20-CR-13 Excerpt, #3 Exhibit 3 - Perry County case 21-CR-136 Plea Offer, #4 Exhibit 4 - Perry County case 20-CR-55 Plea Offer, #5 Exhibit 5 - Administrative Remedy, #6 Envelope no pm)(RCB) |
Conflict Check run. (RCB) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason J. Moore (RCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moore v. Hughes | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jason J. Moore | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Craig Hughes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.