Maynard v. Wolford, LLC et al
Betty Maynard |
Wolford, LLC, Matthew Lester and GEICO Indemnity Company |
John Doe |
7:2023cv00057 |
July 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Edward B Atkins |
Robert E Wier |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against John Doe, filed by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Collision Report) (TDA) |
Filing 26 ORDER: Dfts Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint (R. #22 ) is GRANTED. Clerk directed to file Dfts Third-Party Complaint (R. #22 -1) into the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plas request for 60-day extension to amend pleadings and join additional parties (R. #23 ; R. #24 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 9/19/2023. (TDA)cc: COR |
Filing 25 REPLY to Response to Motion re #22 MOTION for Leave to File by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC filed by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC. (Richardson, Melissa) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: re #22 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Complaint by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC. (TDA) |
Filing 24 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE BRIEF to #22 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Complaint filed by Betty Maynard. (Hall, Michael) Modified text & created link on 9/5/2023 (TDA). |
Filing 23 RESPONSE to #22 To Motion For Leave To File Third Party Complaint filed by Betty Maynard. (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Complaint by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC. Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Third-Party Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Collision Report, #3 Proposed Order)(Richardson, Melissa) Modified text on 9/1/2023 (TDA). |
Filing 21 NOTICE by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC of Service of Initial Disclosures (Richardson, Melissa) |
Filing 20 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by GEICO Indemnity Company identifying Corporate Parent GEICO Indemnity Company, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Corporate Parent GEICO Corporation for GEICO Indemnity Company.. (Atzinger, Bradley) |
Filing 19 DISCLOSURES by GEICO Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Policy)(Atzinger, Bradley) |
Filing 18 NOTICE by Betty Maynard of Service of Discovery Responses (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 17 NOTICE by Betty Maynard of Service of Discovery Responses (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 16 VIRTUAL ORDER: granting #15 Motion to Strike Documents From The Record, by Betty Maynard. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 8/30/2023. (TDA) cc: COR |
Filing 15 MOTION to Strike by Betty Maynard Documents From The Record Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 14 NOTICE by Betty Maynard of Plaintiffs Inital Disclosures (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 13 STRICKEN pursuant to Order #16. Modified text & restrictions on 8/30/2023 (TDA). |
Filing 12 STRICKEN pursuant to Order #16. Modified text & restrictions on 8/30/2023 (TDA). |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. parties serve initial disclosures by August 31, 2023. Supplement pursuant to Rule 26(e). 2. Pla file any motion to join parties or amend pleadings by August 31, 2023. 3. Dfts by October 31, 2023. 4. Supplement pursuant to Rule 26(e) nlt March 1, 2024. 5. Per FRCP 26(a)(2), nlt March 31, 2024, pla disclose identity of expert witnesses. Need not be filed. 6. Dft by May 31, 2024. 7. NLT July 1, 2024, counsel complete all discovery, including expert. 8. Status report due nlt July 1, 2024. 9. Parties file dispositive motions, Daubert motions, and motions in limine nlt July 30, 2024, with response and reply per LR 7.1(c). 10. Shall discovery dispute arise, parties comply w/ Order #5 . 11. Courtesy copy of briefs and memoranda be provided to chambers w/in 48 hours of filing; paper form or emailed to Wier's Chambers. 12. Telephonic mid-discovery conference assigned on March 27, 2024 at 2:00 p.m., shall be ON THE RECORD, in FRANKFORT. Counsel access by Microsoft Teams. 13. Requests to modify dates or deadlines be submitted upon motion prior to expiration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 8/9/2023. (TDA)cc: COR, FktCD |
NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO REQUEST E-Filing Privileges to Kirstin Handshoe: re #11 Scheduling Order. An e-Filing request must be processed through your PACER account. IMPORTANT NOTICE: You are required to electronically file and receive electronic service from the court's automated Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system. If you are not a registered Filing User for the Court's ECF system, please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information and/or training. For additional assistance contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR and via U.S. Mail to Kirstin Handshoe (TDA) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Atkins for review: #10 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (TDA) |
Filing 10 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Richardson, Melissa) |
Attorney Update. Attorney Kolbe Aaron Page added for Betty Maynard, per DE #7, 8 & 9. (TDA) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING by Betty Maynard of Service of Discovery Requests (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING by Betty Maynard of Service of Discovery Requests (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING by Betty Maynard of Service of Discovery Requests (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 6 ORDER: 1. Within 21 days, parties shall meet to consider topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. 2. Within 14 days of meeting, parties shall file a joint status report containing: a-d. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 7/25/2023. (RCB)cc: COR |
Filing 5 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier. (TDA)cc: COR |
Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wolford, LLC. (TDA) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING REMOVAL by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC. (TDA) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pike Circuit Court, case number 23-CI-00580. (Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5609500), filed by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B - NOF Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(TDA) |
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Matthew Lester, Wolford, LLC. State Court Pleading; See DE #1 , Ex A pgs 37-44 for pdf. (TDA) |
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by GEICO Indemnity Company. State Court Pleading; See DE #1 , Ex A pgs 34-36 for pdf. (TDA) |
Conflict Check run. (TDA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.