Brown v. United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy
| Terrance Brown |
| United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy |
| 7:2023cv00083 |
| October 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Robert E Wier |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER requesting addresses for FBI Field Office, for Inez, KY, Martin County Sheriff's Police Department and Attorney General Investigative Jurisdiction from Terrance Brown pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Postmarked 11/6/23) (TDA) |
| CLERK'S VIRTUAL NOTICE TO Terrance Brown re #6 Letter: In response to your request for the Clerk to provide you with mailing addresses of outside entities, please be advised the Clerk does not maintain this information. Therefore, we are unable to provide the information requested. cc: Terrance Brown by US Mail (TDA) |
Filing 5
JUDGMENT: Court ORDERS and ADJUDGES as follows: 1. Terrance Brown's DE #1 complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 10/26/2023. (RCB) cc: COR and Terrance Brown by US Mail
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 1. Court DISMISSES without prejudice Terrance Brown's DE #1 complaint. 2. Court directs Clerk to STRIKE this matter from docket. 3. Clerk shall SEND Brown the following blank forms: a. a form Civil Rights Complaint [EDKY Form 520]; b. an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [AO Form 240]; and c. a Certificate of Inmate Account Form [EDKY Form 523]. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 10/26/2023. (RCB) cc: COR and Terrance Brown w/forms EDKY 520, AO 240, EDKY 523 by US Mail
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers. (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (TDA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to Judge (No Filing Fee Paid), filed by Terrance Brown pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope PM 10/20/23) (TDA) |
| Conflict Check run. (TDA) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint (Referred); no filing fees paid nor Mtn IFP filed. (TDA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terrance Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
