Johnson v. Commonwealth of KY - County of Butler et al
| Wayne Johnson |
| Commonwealth of KY - County of Butler, Butler County Sheriff's Department and Heath West |
| 1:2012cv00037 |
| March 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Butler |
| E. Robert Goebel |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
Jury Instructions. (CDR)
|
|
Filing
82
Jury Instructions. (CDR)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 08/18/2014. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [DN 25 ] is DENIED. Defendant Commonwealth of Kentucky-County of Butler, Butler County Sheriff's Department, and Deputy Heath West's Motion for Summary Judgment [DN 31 ] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is GRANTED to all claims against Butler County, Butler County Sheriff's Department, and Deputy West in his official capacity. It is als o GRANTED as to the claim of outrage/intentional infliction of emotional distress against Deputy West in his individual capacity. It is DENIED to all other claims against Deputy West in his individual capacity. Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Dr. Terry Cox [DN 32 ] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set out above. cc: Counsel (TJD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
