Cases 1 - 10 of 567
Johnson v. US Postal Employees et al
as 3:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson and Ronald Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
US Postal Employees and Securus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Johnson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Employees et al
as 4:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Employees and US Postmaster Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 5:2024ct03052
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office and Michael Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Waltz v. Johnston Transportation, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Waltz
Defendant:
Johnston Transportation, LLC and Billy Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Eddy County Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Eddy County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
