Bonds v. Todd County Detention Center et al
Todd Bonds |
Todd County Detention Center, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Greg Allen, Captain Fowler, Betsy Walker and Deputy Kliner |
1:2016cv00016 |
February 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Bowling Green Office |
Todd |
Greg N. Stivers |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 9/14/2017 granting 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Captain Fowler, and denying 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Todd Bonds. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (CDR) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 9/29/2016; Plaintiff's claims related to human trafficking, obstruction of justice, the Open Records Act, the ADA, equal protection, harassment and humiliation, deliberate indifference to safety, retaliation, and grievances are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate the following Defendants as parties to this action: the Todd County Detention Center, the Kentucky Department of Corrections, Greg Allen, Sgt. Betsy Walker, and Deputy Kliner. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order to govern the development of the remaining claim. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Todd County Attorney (CDR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.