Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Todd Bonds v. Berne Union Local Schools, et al
as 24-3283
Plaintiff:
TODD BONDS
Defendant:
DANIEL SNIVLEY, Athletic Director, Individually, LEAH ARMSTRONG, Case Worker, Individually and BERNE UNION LOCAL SCHOOLS
BOND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12848
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TODD BOND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BONDS v. HOLLYWOOD CASINO AND HOTEL et al
as 1:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
TODD BONDS
Defendant:
HOLLYWOOD CASINO AND HOTEL, BARSTOOL SPORTSBOOK, LORA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Bonds v. Berne Union Local Schools et al
as 2:2020cv05367
Defendant:
John Parker, Daniel Snivley, Fairfield County Job and Family Services and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Bonds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00307
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bonds v. Jack Casino et al
as 1:2019cv01059
Defendant:
Jack Casino and Kelli Doe
Plaintiff:
Todd Bonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONDS v. RISING STAR CASINO RESORT. et al
as 4:2019cv00151
Defendant:
FULL HOUSE RESORTS, BEN DOUGLASS, ANGI TRUEBNER-WEBB and others
Plaintiff:
TODD BONDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bonds v. Daley et al
as 2:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Todd Bonds
Defendant:
James Daley, Marc Brandt and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Oldaker et al
as 3:2016cv00724
Plaintiff:
Todd Bonds
Defendant:
Daniel Oldaker, Shierra Brown, Dawn Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. The Office of the Attorney General et al
as 3:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Todd Bonds
Defendant:
The Office of the Attorney General, Two Unknown Kentucky State Police, Kentucky State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
