Bonds v. Jack Casino et al
| Todd Bonds |
| Jack Casino and Kelli Doe |
| 1:2019cv01059 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CLERK'S JUDGMENT filed concurrently with #5 Order signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 1/3/2020. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re #4 Report and Recommendation; plaintiff's federal law claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims and, therefore, dismisses them without prejudice to refiling in state court. Finally, the Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and thus plaintiff is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. However,plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997). Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 1/3/2020. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's federal law claims be dismissed with prejudice. 2. The Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims and dismiss the state law claims without prejudice to refiling in state court. 3. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. l 915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal informa pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed informa pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Objections to R&R due by 1/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/18/2019. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Jack Casino, Kelli Doe, filed by Todd Bonds. (bjc) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/18/2019. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Todd Bonds. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
