Union Underwear Company, Inc. v. Heritage Sportswear, Inc.
Union Underwear Company, Inc. |
Heritage Sportswear, Inc. |
1:2018cv00090 |
July 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Bowling Green Office |
Warren |
H Brent Brennenstuhl |
Greg N Stivers |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER FOR RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 9/6/2018. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl will conduct a telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference on 10/30/2018 at 10:00 CDT. The Court will initiate the call. Counsel who will try the case shall participate. Meeting of the parties due by 10/9/2018. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/23/2018. See Order for details. cc:counsel (JWM) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 09/05/2018; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Brennenstuhl is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel; KLL (TJD) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM against Union Underwear Company, Inc. by Heritage Sportswear, Inc.. (McGill, Matthew) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Union Underwear Company, Inc. as to Heritage Sportsware, Inc. (Vitale, Michael) Modified to edit text on 8/21/2018 (JWM). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Heritage Sportswear, Inc. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (CDF) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. for Union Underwear Company, Inc., by Union Underwear Company, Inc. (CDF) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Greg N. Stivers. (CDF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Heritage Sportswear, Inc., filed by Union Underwear Company, Inc. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2676530.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Fruit's Statement for goods and services, #2 Exhibit B - Demand letter, #3 Cover Sheet) (CDF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Union Underwear Company, Inc. v. Heritage Sportswear, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Heritage Sportswear, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Matthew M. McGill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Union Underwear Company, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael S. Vitale |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.