Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fruit of the Loom, Inc. et al v. Geisenberger et al
as 1:2019cv02273
Plaintiff:
Vanity Fair Brands, LP, Russell Brands, LLC, Fruit of the Loom, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Michelle M. Sullivan, Brenda Mayrack and Richard J. Geisenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Union Underwear Company, Inc. v. Heritage Sportswear, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00090
Defendant:
Heritage Sportswear, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Union Underwear Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Union Underwear Company, Inc. v. Hartman
as 1:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Union Underwear Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark W. Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Williams v. Union Underwear Company, Inc.
as 14-6359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION UNDERWEAR COMPANY, INC., dba Fruit of the Loom
Williams v. Union Underwear Company, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Defendant:
Union Underwear Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Russell Brands LLC et al v. Gildan Activewear, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Russell Brands LLC and Union Underwear Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Gildan Activewear, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Union Underwear Company, Inc. v. Primo S.A. de C.V. et al
as 1:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Union Underwear Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Primo S.A. de C.V. and David J. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
UNION UNDERWEAR COMPANY, INC. et al v. GI APPAREL, INC. et al
as 2:2008mc00289
Plaintiff:
UNION UNDERWEAR COMPANY, INC., d/b/a FRUIT OF THE LOOM and RUSSELL CORPORATION
Defendant:
GI APPAREL, INC. and ANTHONY PRISCO
Pelzer v. Union Underwear Company Inc
as 2:2008cv02438
Plaintiff:
Don Pelzer
Defendant:
Union Underwear Company Inc and Union Underwear Company Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
