Kentuckians for the Commonwealth et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
Kentuckians for the Commonwealth and Sierra Club |
United States Army Corps of Engineers and Thomas P. Bostick |
3:2012cv00682 |
October 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Laurel |
Thomas B. Russell |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/18/2013; re DN 73 & 80 cc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 70 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/23/2013; re 21 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Sierra Club, Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, 68 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Water Quality C laims filed by Leeco, Inc., 66 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count Four of the Complaint filed by Luke T. Leonard, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P. Bostick, 62 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgm ent on Count Four filed by Sierra Club, Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, 34 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Luke T. Leonard, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P. Bostick, 33 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Leeco, Inc. ; an appropriate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 58 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 28 Motion to Consider. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 6/12/2013. cc:counsel (KJA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.