Cases 1 - 10 of 108
United States of America v. Acquest Transit LLC
as 21-659
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense Army Corps of Engineers, William J. Hochul, Jr., in his official capacity as United States Attorney for the Western District of New York, Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Acquest Transit LLC, Acquest Development, LLC and Mr. William L. Huntress
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
White Oak Realty, L.L.C., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 17-30438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WHITE OAK REALTY, L.L.C. and CITRUS REALTY, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, Lieutenant General, United States Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity, JOHN W. PEABODY, Major General, Commander, Mississippi Valley Division, United States Army Corps of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
Friends of the River v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 2:2016cv00818
Plaintiff:
Friends of the River
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service , Penny Pritzker , United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Los Angeles Region v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2016cv01091
Defendant:
Lieutenant General Thomas P. Bostick and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff:
California Regional Water Quality Control Board-Los Angeles Region
Gulf Coast Rod Reel & Gun Club, et al v. Jerry Patterson, et al
as 16-40181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GULF COAST ROD, REEL AND GUN CLUB, INCORPORATED and GILCHRIST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, COLONEL CHRISTOPHER W. SALLESE, in his official capacity as District Engineer, Galveston District United States Army Corps of Engineers, LIEUTENANT GENERAL THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commander and Chief of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Arizona Mining Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-4404
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
ARIZONA MINING ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA FARM BUREAU, ASSOCIATION OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Friends of Lydia Ann Channel v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 2:2015cv00514
Plaintiff:
Friends of Lydia Ann Channel
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, Col. Richard P. Pannell and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Atchafalaya Basinkeeper et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 2:2015cv06982
Plaintiff:
Atchafalaya Basinkeeper , Louisiana Crawfish Producers Association - West and Gulf Restoration Network
Defendant:
Thomas P Bostick and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gulf Restoration Network et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2015cv06193
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P Bostick, Richard L Hansen and others
Plaintiff:
Gulf Restoration Network , Margie Vicknair-Pray and Pippin Frisbie-Calder
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Louisiana State v. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 15-30962
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE, through the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board and the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, RICHARD L. HANSEN, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Commander for the New Orleans District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL C. WEHR, Major, in his official capacity as Commander for the Mississippi Valley Division of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
