McKinney v. Napier et al
| Robert Willis McKinney |
| Angela Napier, Michelle Wagiel, Charles Wilkerson and Rodney Ballard |
| 3:2017cv00028 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Mercer |
| David J. Hale |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. Motion to strike (DN 42 ) is denied. Claims in amended complaint (DN 41 ) to proceed as set forth. Clerk to add Kelly Napier and Daniel Napier as defendants to docket. Clerk to forward copy o f complaint, amended complaint and this memorandum opinion and order to Justice & Public Safety Cabinet as set forth. Clerk to prepare summons at address provided by Justice & Public Safety Cabinet if waiver of service is not returned. cc: Counsel, plaintiff pro se, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet, Defendants A. Napier, K. Napier, D. Napier(JAC)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. Claims against Defendant Ballard and Wilkerson are dismissed. Clerk to terminate Defendants Ballard and Wilkerson from this action. Retaliation claims against Defendants Napier and Wagiel will proceed. Legal mail claim against Wagiel will proceed. cc: plaintiff pro se, Gen Counsel Justice & Pub Saf Cab (JAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
