Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Oliver Bolotin, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-1838
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Clarence Gallinger, Lawanda Drayton, Maurice Saxton and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Bolotin et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02481
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lunsford, Shamailla White, Oliver Bolotin and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
CONKEL et al v. WILKERSON et al
as 5:2020cv00045
Defendant:
CHARLES WILKERSON and WILKERSONS ATA MARTIAL ARTS
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CONKEL and RISSA KILAR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McKinney v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00543
Plaintiff:
Robert Willis McKinney
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, James Erwin, Gregory S. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILKERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01103
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
CHARLES WILKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jorge Tamayo-Mora v. Charles Wilkerson, et al
as 17-5176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE LUIS TAMAYO-MORA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES WILKERSON, TONEY BAILEY and LADONNA THOMPSON
McKinney v. Napier et al
as 3:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Robert Willis McKinney
Defendant:
Angela Napier, Michelle Wagiel, Charles Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv03469
Petitioner:
Charles Wilkerson, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinney v. Wilkerson
as 5:2016cv00382
Plaintiff:
Robert McKinney
Defendant:
Charles Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamayo-Mora v. Wilkerson et al
as 3:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jorge Tamayo-Mora
Defendant:
Charles Wilkerson, Toney Bailey and LaDonna Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
